Grr...

[mimi_sardinia]

It seems I should keep a closer eye on my favourite characters' Wikipedia pages.

There was a paragraph I removed from the article about Laguna that speculated that he could get impeached because of the game events. It's pure speculation that is not hinted at all in the game, and it also smacks of being written in by someone who has some sort of grudge against Laguna - or at least that's how I feel.

But some time in November a new version of it got put back in.

Oh I deleted it again, but still, I don't particularly like that such speculation on post-game events has been included in the article - especially when it's so negative about a character who so adorkable.

I'll just have to watch the article better, that it doesn't happen again.

Comments

[kalloway]

I saw that the other day and was thoroughly baffled. I was wondering if there was some cutscene I never triggered or something.

[mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com]

No... people can indulge themselves in fanon on Wikipedia, and it gets annoying when it appears in the articles.

I also saw something should rightly pull to shreds in the character page, but I was too tired last night to nitpick the entry and I'm too tired now (short sleep, plus I'm only up at this hour because of bloody Centrelink - it's a work day, so I'm comign straight home to bed).

[kalloway]

*nods* I figured it was just vandalism, but considering that I find new parts in games all the time, well, wasn't sure...

[mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com]

As I said, I chalk it up to someone with a grude against Laguna. I did pull that tidbit off the article back in April.